 Magento 2.1.2 super slow
 How do you set the special_price of product in magento via direct SQL query?
 How to import products very fast into my site from csv file
 How to disable Role Permissions for “Export to” and Print “Actions”?
 View action open blank detail page for an order in adminhtml
 Wich Anime should i watch next?
 iRobot Create2+Arduino: Make the robot stop when facing an obstacle
 Is it best to make independent claims very broad and depended claims very narrow?
 Create Validation Rule Error Message
 LogUnsubEvent without JobId
 Can't set up a lightning component tab for one of my components
 Is there a way to run an arbitrary Visualforce page in Lightning Experience?
 How to get a customcontroller to return only certain data in a query?
 Completed Admin Beginner trail but now it's showing 48% complete
 Calls within Rep Queue
 Adding picklist value to changeset
 Target vs Contro using Automation Studio
 attached Entitlement to the case using criteria
 Display Json data in inputfield on dropdown change
 As a Jew, I need an explanation on this
Naive Bayes Should generate prediction given missing features (scikit learn)
Seeing that Naive Bayes uses probability to make a prediction, and treats features as being conditionally independent of each other, then it makes sense that the model can still make a prediction given that there are some features missing in the test data.
I know that it is common practice to impute missing data, but why do this when Naïve Bayes should be able to make a prediction given that there are some features missing?
Can this be implemented in scikit learn? I tried a test set with less features, and got a ValueError as the shapes are not aligned.
So theoretically this is possible, but is it possible in scikit learn?
Your question is sensible. The way in which posterior probability is calculated in the classical Naive Bayes classifier (in sklearn) is like summation of the conditional probabilities of the all the features in the dataset. Even though the features are treated as conditionally independent, to learn the classification probability all the feat

Your question is sensible. The way in which posterior probability is calculated in the classical Naive Bayes classifier (in sklearn) is like summation of the conditional probabilities of the all the features in the dataset. Even though the features are treated as conditionally independent, to learn the classification probability all the features are always used in this setup. Once the model has been learned you still all those features to calculate the posterior for a new observation. The conditional independence is just an assumption that is taken to make the statistics and math obey the rules and work.
But slightly modifying the way in which the posterior is calculated you can use Bayesian approach to make predictions even with the absence of certain features. Using Bayesian approach to make predictions in the absence of certain features is still an ongoing work. You may want to have a look at this paper in which Bayesian approach is applied to astronomy to do classification with
20170320 23:57:20