- Did the French Revolution help produce French military “elan?”
- Why did France surrender so quickly during ww2?
- Were the laity allowed into the court of the tabernacle?
- What is the outer darkness referred to in Matthew?
- Why does John refer to 666 as a mark, a name, and a number all in the same verse?
- What is the sandhi wichcheed of अद्रशन्नद्रशन्नुदहार्य:?
- Are there performance implications using the “timestamp” property of ImportMulti in the following way?
- How many shares need to be mined before a block is released?
- Changing wallet password using double quotation marks turn out to be mysterious (Qtum Core)
- Solve math problems for Bitcoin
- How should I invest $10,000 in crypto-currency?
- How to say, “Pride makes other people feel bad about themselves”?
- Resampling with unrelated filtering
- RF samples for GPS L1, L2 and L5 on github
- Why are filter's phase response has discontinuities at these points
- Speech dereverbaration via maximum kurtosis adaptive filtering
- Is it safe to plug a power strip into a travel adapter plug?
- Is there a powerstrip which accomodates most if not all AC power plugs?
- UK: Temporary admission to a person liable to be detained returning to the UK without a visa
- は or が in the example “朝起きるとき、鳥 ( ) いつも歌います”?

# Does showing a problem and its complement are not Turing-decidable means that the language & its complement are not Turing-recognizable?

I was reading the Sipser's book on the Theory of Computation, 3rd edition and came up with a question. "Does showing a problem and its complement are not Turing-decidable means that the language & its complement are not Turing-recognizable?" I believe that the answer is NO, however, the Theorem 5.30 states something different.

There are two problems concerned in this question. One is $A_{TM} = \{

On Page 238, the Theorem 5.30 is stated as follows:

Theorem 5.30 $EQ_{TM}$ is neither Turing-recognizable nor co-Turing-recognizable.

The proof is by mapping reduction of $A_{TM}$ to $\overline{EQ_{TM}}$, and at the same time, reduction from $A_{TM}$ to $EQ_{TM}$. This way, it has shown:

$\overline{EQ_{TM}}$ is Turing-undecidable.

$EQ_{TM}$ is Turing-undecidable.

Note that this reduction does not show that either of $\overlin