- Why do wave reflection show no phase change while striking a lighter medium?
- Why does a conservative force return the work done against it by a body to that body?
- How to prove Kepler's 3rd law?
- Work -Energy misunderstanding
- Quantum fields and Virtual Particles
- Neutron stars and black holes
- What actually is the so called “Electromagnetic field”?
- How do I write the relative acceleration between 2 points each in a rotating frame in an inertial frame
- Keeping track of units
- First Variation of Jacobi operator
- How to containerize apps?
- How to transfer data
- Connected no internet on my acre tablet device using mobile wifi
- Strange footprint labeled PJ## on laptop's motherboard
- Why are the E-series numbers different from the powers of 10?
- How to find the value of alpha in this curcuit?
- Current waveform electric motor
- can a PC parallel port produce interference?
- transistor replacement dp35dp
- How to test for shorts on a breakout?
Aeropress metal filters, are they worth it?
I was wondering (other than the long term saving of not having to buy paper filters), what are the advantages of using a metal filter such as this?
In the copy is states:
Fuller body cup of coffee
But is this something the average Joe would notice or is it marketing spiel?
My main thought would be you would get less of a papery taste, but after rinsing the filter, I can;t say that I've ever noticed the taste of paper from a filter (maybe if I had did an A/B test between the 2 I would?).
Would like to hear any thoughts from people that have one?
I have used both the paper filters and the "Able" brand metal AeroPress disk that you linked. They are a bit different, and I use both the metal disk and paper filter based on my mood. To my taste, the metal disk does produce a "fuller" bodied cup (because more "stuff" comes through the filter -- oils and macro-particles or whatever). I believe that "an average user" (by my definition) would be able to tell the diffe
I have used both the paper filters and the "Able" brand metal AeroPress disk that you linked. They are a bit different, and I use both the metal disk and paper filter based on my mood. To my taste, the metal disk does produce a "fuller" bodied cup (because more "stuff" comes through the filter -- oils and macro-particles or whatever). I believe that "an average user" (by my definition) would be able to tell the difference in a side-by-side test, and probably enough to determine preference.
That said, I prefer the paper for a few reasons.
First, the simple convenience is better for me. After brewing, I plunge the filter and spent grounds directly into my compost container. After a quick rinse of the unit, it's clean enough for me.
As for my (personal) taste and preferences, I think the paper produces a better quality and more enjoyable cup. Since the perforations are larger, there is more grit in the output when using the metal disk, so you end up with a (small amount) of "sludge"2017-04-21 12:26:33
Yes. Totally worth it.
I just didn't enjoy the taste of the coffee pressed through those paper filters, and even if it could be improved somewhat by letting the coffee sit in the Aeropress for 40-60 seconds before pressing it out, I still couldn't see myself continuing to use it if that was all it was going to give me in terms of taste. Then I bought the "fine" version of the Able Brewing disk filter and that's when the taste finally matched my expectations - I really need those oils and those fine grounds in there, I don't think I can do without them in a hot-brew (after all, professional espresso has all that too).
I completely switched away from my French press since getting that filter and now I use the Aeropress both for my weekend hot-brews and as a strainer for the cold-brew I sometimes make in larger quantities to take with me to work (pressing the coffee through works much faster than pouring it in a regular strainer and waiting for gravity to do the work).
The only thing2017-04-21 12:51:21
After reading the OP I recalled that I had purchased a fine disk filter some time ago. I only used it half a dozen times or so because at that time I thought it was the source of my bitter coffee and switched to paper filters. I later realized that I was wrong, and that the main issue for me was the grind size, but never gave the disk filter another shot until just now. I agree with Don Joe above. A casual coffee drinker is unlikely to know the difference beyond a few dregs at the bottom of the cup. The more serious coffee drinker however will likely notice the fuller body. After using paper filters for so long I definitely prefer this particular coffee with the fine disk filter. With that I'll add that for me I didn't appreciate the disk filter until I had the other components of my brew dialed in. Again as Don Joe suggested, it may not be a one or the other decision. The disk filter will likely be good for some or even many coffees, but paper works for others. For me I'm glad t2017-04-21 13:21:56
It's worth it if you like more oils in your coffee. It's produces a body somewhere in between paper filtered, and french press. So it's totally up to your preference. I would add that for me, some roast levels are better with more oils than others. So it's not a general rule that you need apply to all coffees.
I have the Able FINE-DISK filter, and I use it for most origins and roast levels. I use paper for really light roasts for a cleaner, more floral flavor. It's definitely something the average Joe could notice if given the two side-by-side. You can see the oils from a metal filtered coffee, floating on the surface. I would say it would be much harder to taste the difference. For someone who drinks a lot of coffee, I would say it would be easy to notice.2017-04-21 13:27:58
I have used both, paper filters and a kind of metal disk filter by yolococa that was advertised as easy to clean.
The difference in taste wasn't huge but the metal filter soon started to clog with ground coffee and was increasingly hard to clean. Just rinsing it did not work I had to ally pressured water to force the holes free.
Because of that I changed back to using paper filters.2017-04-21 13:50:01