- Did “user” have positive or negative connotation in 1950?
- The pronunciation of final [s]
- Question about SAAS and Email
- “Parishioner” vs. “congregant”
- Form of verb after a preposition
- Why does the contraction “she's” mean she is and she has?
- safe investment for elderly
- Portfolio asset allocation and leverage
- Repetition inside tabular
- Line breaks in underlined citations
- Errors when changing chapter's appearence in TOC with tocloft
- Best Practices Compilation in Math Mode
- How to redefine a command to contain itself in it by maintaining it's syntax unchanged
- Force list-like indentation
- termcal, is week number present?
- use of \newcommand in user-written LaTeX package
- Render a texture in background of text
- Adding Unique Properties to Each Feature in a Large GeoJson
- r.stream.basin in qgis
- Network Analyst not using turns?
Create a civilization out of our domesticated animals - The Dolittle plan
Human civilization really took off when individuals started to interact with each other, in language and trade and settlements. The transition from stone age to our space faring civilization of today wasn't as much a matter of sudden genetic mutation as it was a social organization realizing a latent potential. I hope there're no big disagreements about that so far.
Regard dogs. Very social and somewhat malleable domesticated animals as we have bred them. What if we tought them to "speak" with each other? Not teach them to speak with us (like Dolittle), which all dog training to date seems to focus on. But to use our technology to create dog-to-dog-adapted multimedia user interfaces to facilitate the dogs' communication with each other. Creating a dog language for dog use. Even if we might not understand all of what they chat with each other using it. For them to create their own civilization on their conditions here among us.
The dog-communicating civilization, as far