- make homepage of site with page available in site assets
- Automatically set value for certain fields in the new form before check in activity for the document library new form
- Button using Column Formatting - Change Yes / No value
- Searchable integer managed property - ows_ListItemId
- How to restrict sharepoint admin from document libaray access
- Sharepoint Online - missing webparts on team site
- Set Taxonomy field values in JSlink in the new form
- How can I link 3 lists in the same sharepoint website and use look up column as well?
- Update Lookup Site Column
- IE crash on sharepoint online site
- Benefits of multiple membrane sweeps
- How to index multiple values with Search API?
- Resolve CORS issue without changing services.yml file
- Translatable strings not appearing in the translation interface
- How long is considered `long-term'?
- Generating Brainf*** NOPs
- Can Random String Generation be faster in Java?
- Notification system same code running twice, simplify it
- Array Interlacing
- Remove unwanted characters from a string
Could it be that a group of matches with the largest cM value in the mid 20s are out-of-range?
WARNING: This is another question that involves endogamous genetic genealogy. (Not applicable to "normal" or "standard" DNA evaluation).
I am still struggling to find some statistical limits/boundaries for evaluating my endogamous ancestry. Maybe I need to read more on the subject... but this subject matter is fairly limited -- and usually complex for me, at the best of times.
In my question I am wondering if my group of atDNA matches, that have a "largest cM" value of about 25, might have the common ancestor that is out of range (or pre-1700s/ pre-source). Part of the problem is, that I have nearly ten people in this group with a value of >20 cM, and their family tree's are well developed, yet not even three of these matches share one common ancestor!
I'm wondering what the outer limits are, in terms of cM, for endogamous groups. I thought that >20 cM would surely be within reach... but maybe not. And are there other ways of evaluating this situation...